1857 – Two Opposite Perceptions

Abstract

This article attempts to look at the two opposite interpretations of the 1857 Revolt – the interpretations projected by the Western and nationalist writers, without subscribing fully to either of them, this article proposes to look into the background and the result of the rebellion of 1857 in an objective manner. The assertion here is not on morality of the events, rather it is held that passing moral judgment may not bring to limelight the actual historical facts. It is argued here that the West, and in this case England, was far ahead of India in material terms with an expanded economy, command over new technology, better arms and ammunition and a superior system of administration. It was simply impossible for India to resist and with stand the British onslaught. The Indian society was not as advanced as some nationalist historians would make us believe; at least it was way behind its opponent. This is what was realised by very few people like Mirza Ghalib and Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, who wished to inculcate among the Indians a rational view of their situation.